H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 1-0

Dominik Hrbaty holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2004 Marseille round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominik Hrbaty #44 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Mahut #98 Match data Feb 26, 2004* R32 Marseille International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,941 328 299 52.3% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,690 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2000 38–28 57.6% #17 1,834 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,677 0 3 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,671 0 3 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,669 0 3 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2004 41–25 62.1% #14 1,739 0 6 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,595 0 6 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2008 4–8 33.3% #253 1,571 0 6 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,651 0 6 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,591 0 6 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 8 7 15 53.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 23 15 38 60.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 11 10 21 52.4% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 22 18 40 55.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2002 12 17 29 41.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2004 29 12 41 70.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 24 15 39 61.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2006 20 16 36 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2007 6 12 18 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 171 151 322 53.1% 119 104 223 53.4% 6 18 24 25.0% 32 26 58 55.2% — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 577/626 of Dominik Hrbaty's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 1997 40/47 5.2 4.8 54.7% 73.2% 49.5% 60.2% 41.6% 62.6% 37.6% 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 1998 50/56 5.0 4.6 53.7% 70.2% 50.9% 55.2% 43.7% 61.1% 39.2% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 1999 51/64 6.5 4.3 53.5% 73.4% 52.0% 59.9% 51.0% 63.3% 39.8% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2000 60/66 6.8 4.1 54.7% 75.1% 51.4% 60.1% 40.4% 64.4% 39.9% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2001 48/57 7.2 5.4 53.5% 71.4% 47.7% 56.8% 44.3% 60.6% 38.7% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2002 48/50 4.0 4.1 57.4% 69.6% 48.7% 55.8% 40.8% 60.7% 37.8% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2003 50/51 4.5 3.0 60.4% 71.9% 52.0% 54.4% 42.5% 63.8% 39.3% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2004 63/66 4.5 2.9 63.7% 71.6% 53.9% 66.7% 43.9% 65.1% 39.6% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2005 62/62 5.1 3.6 58.5% 70.4% 50.6% 64.8% 43.1% 62.2% 40.4% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2006 57/57 4.2 4.5 55.7% 70.2% 48.0% 59.2% 41.8% 60.5% 39.2% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2007 30/30 3.5 4.7 55.9% 67.4% 45.0% 47.0% 36.0% 57.5% 38.3% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2008 10/12 2.2 4.5 60.2% 66.6% 40.0% 43.8% 55.8% 56.2% 45.7% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2009 7/7 2.4 2.7 57.9% 66.4% 44.3% 42.4% 39.2% 57.3% 32.3% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 47.8% 40.9% 45.8% 54.5% 25.0% 43.5% 32.7% 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career — 577/627 5.1 4.1 56.8% 71.3% 50.0% 58.5% 43.1% 62.1% 39.2% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1486 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 1997 1715 142.2 +1.61 -0.42 1.004 50.2% -92 +38 — 49.1% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 11–10 (52%) 102.0 -1.58 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 1998 1690 141.2 -0.50 +0.95 1.009 50.1% -58 +83 — 52.9% +0.21 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 98.0 -0.64 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 1999 1700 144.9 +1.84 +1.64 1.086 51.5% -29 +125 — 54.6% +0.55 14–10 (58%) 9–14 (39%) 99.7 -0.52 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 -0.20
22 2000 1835 148.4 +2.28 +2.25 1.120 51.8% -19 -21 — 55.5% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 12–12 (50%) 101.1 +0.54 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 +0.16
23 2001 1677 137.6 -1.21 +1.03 0.983 49.6% +75 -12 — 50.0% -0.07 10–10 (50%) 19–11 (63%) 101.7 +1.46 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2002 1671 135.6 -1.20 +0.37 0.964 49.6% +27 -7 — 43.9% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.5 +0.59 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) 100.3 -1.54
25 2003 1670 139.0 +1.39 +1.61 1.088 51.2% -3 +27 — 50.8% +0.13 4–12 (25%) 9–11 (45%) 92.0 -0.71 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 101.5 -1.38
26 2004 1740 144.0 +2.13 +2.58 1.135 52.4% +38 -62 -263 58.5% +0.63 14–7 (67%) 12–9 (57%) 104.5 +2.00 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) 97.7 -1.66
27 2005 1823 147.1 -0.18 +3.32 1.071 51.2% +25 -104 -310 56.9% +0.52 8–8 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 98.4 +1.59 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2006 1803 139.3 -1.67 +2.09 0.992 49.8% +39 -81 -302 48.6% -0.03 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) 102.7 +2.37 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 96.5 -0.59
29 2007 1596 123.8 -3.83 +0.87 0.902 47.6% +90 +13 — 36.8% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 10–8 (56%) 92.8 +1.43 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -0.18
30 2008 1571 124.3 -3.12 +4.09 1.044 50.2% +62 +9 — 33.3% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.05 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) 101.2 -1.76
31 2009 1651 116.6 -2.65 -1.02 0.757 44.5% +45 — — 36.8% -1.52 0–2 1–0 — +0.05 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 +0.94
32 2010 1592 105.9 -0.65 +0.69 0.578 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) 97.4 +0.82
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) 105.4 +0.49
34 2012 1587 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) 103.5 +1.44
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 +0.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.4 +0.03
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 98.8 +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 145.2 +0.15 +1.64 1.034 50.5% +18 +24 -291 51.1% +0.14 96–102 (48%) 115–112 (51%) 97.7 +1.01 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.