H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-2
Pete Sampras holds a 2–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Pete Sampras | 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pete Sampras | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Pete Sampras | #34 | #1 | 5,792 | 2,265 | 737 | 208 | 78.0% | 14 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 32 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Pete Sampras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #81 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 52–17 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,091 | 1 | 8 |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #3 | 2,118 | 1 | 13 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 82–15 | 84.5% | #1 | 2,126 | 3 | 21 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 74–9 | 89.2% | #1 | 2,196 | 5 | 31 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #1 | 2,134 | 7 | 36 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 66–10 | 86.8% | #1 | 2,183 | 8 | 44 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #1 | 2,187 | 10 | 52 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #1 | 2,042 | 11 | 56 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 38–9 | 80.9% | #3 | 2,117 | 12 | 61 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 13 | 63 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #10 | 2,003 | 13 | 63 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #13 | 1,977 | 14 | 64 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |