H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 0-2
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2002 Long Island second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2002* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-1 6-2 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(11) 6-4 6-1 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |