H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Robert Kendrick H2H: 1-0
Dominik Hrbaty holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Kendrick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2006 Canada Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 6-4 6-4 | Robert Kendrick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Robert Kendrick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |