H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Thomaz Bellucci H2H: 1-0
Dominik Hrbaty holds a 1–0 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominik Hrbaty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,941 | 328 | 299 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,932 | 182 | 204 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Thomaz Bellucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–28 | 57.6% | #17 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #33 | 1,819 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #14 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,701 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #253 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,591 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,614 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,602 | 0 | 4 |