H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dominik Koepfer vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Dominik Koepfer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2020 New York fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 32
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-2 6-4 | Dominik Koepfer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Koepfer | #508 | #49 | 1,207 | 1,806 | 54 | 71 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Koepfer | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #54 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #199 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #102 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #509 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |