H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Dominique Bedel vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 0-1

Robert Vant Hof holds a 1–0 lead over Dominique Bedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robert Vant Hof leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Robert Vant Hof won the 1982 Tokyo Indoor round of 16 7-6 6-7 6-2.

FRA Age 69 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robert Vant Hof 7-6 6-7 6-2 Dominique Bedel #43 Match data Oct 29, 1982* R16 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominique Bedel #711 #41 0 1,651 57 86 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Robert Vant Hof 1,879 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dominique Bedel Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1976 0–2 0.0% #310 1,496 0 0
1977 2–3 40.0% #264 1,513 0 0
1978 1–4 20.0% #170 1,519 0 0
1979 9–9 50.0% #68 1,590 0 0
1980 13–19 40.6% #99 1,589 0 1
1981 7–18 28.0% #100 1,538 0 1
1982 10–11 47.6% #44 1,572 0 1
1983 13–18 41.9% #96 1,589 0 1
1984 2–2 50.0% #308 1,600 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dominique Bedel Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1977 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1979 1 3 4 25.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1980 1 5 6 16.7% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1981 0 6 6 0.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1983 0 1 1 0.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0%
1988 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1989 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
1990 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 3 18 21 14.3% 49 56 105 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dominique Bedel Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1976 1496 118.6 16.7% -1.17 0–1 -0.41 1978 1492 112.1 +23 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.05
1977 1513 108.1 +31 46.2% -0.15 0–1 +0.39 1979 1507 114.6 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) -0.60
1978 1520 116.5 +4 23.1% -2.08 1–1 -0.57 1980 1593 123.7 -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 104.7 +1.15
1979 1590 127.0 -45 +34 48.8% -0.19 1–0 0–2 +1.27 1981 1667 131.2 +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -0.32
1980 1589 122.4 -145 +97 46.3% -0.37 3–9 (25%) 6–5 (55%) 95.5 +2.74 1982 1691 125.8 +19 -146 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 105.0 +3.05
1981 1539 121.6 -139 +85 31.0% -1.41 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29 1983 1722 139.5 -34 -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) 107.1 -1.98
1982 1572 117.4 -133 +71 47.8% -0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 +2.77 1984 1580 107.4 -11 +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 +0.46
1983 1590 130.3 -135 +50 45.9% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +1.06 1985 1520 97.1 +10 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.84
1984 1601 120.0 +56 28.6% -1.00 0–2 -0.46 1987 1498 104.8 28.6% -1.86 0–1 -0.12
1988 1524 125.6 +5 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.53
1989 1554 113.9 +31 -4 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.0 +0.26
1990 1536 95.9 0.0% -3.00 +0.20
Career 1651 131.2 -127 +64 42.4% -0.62 15–23 (39%) 15–20 (43%) 95.1 +4.58 Career 1880 131.6 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.