H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Donald Young vs G. Galimberti H2H: 0-1
G. Galimberti holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, G. Galimberti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, G. Galimberti won the 2005 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | G. Galimberti | 7-6(4) 6-1 6-2 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| G. Galimberti | #1,429 | #115 | 343 | 1,569 | 7 | 19 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donald Young | G. Galimberti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #442 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #308 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #148 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |