H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2007 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2007 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-2 6-4 | Donald Young | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donald Young | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |