H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 0-1
Jean-Rene Lisnard holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Rene Lisnard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Rene Lisnard won the 2005 Miami Masters first round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jean-Rene Lisnard | 6-4 7-5 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donald Young | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |