H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Donald Young vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0

Donald Young holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donald Young leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-6(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donald Young #85 6-4 7-6(1) 6-4 Thomas Fabbiano #141 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donald Young Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
20 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donald Young Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 310/313 of Donald Young's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donald Young Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9% 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
20 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
Career — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donald Young Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.92 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.05 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.45 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.24 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.51 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.47 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.96 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.41 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.