H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 0-1
Vincent Spadea holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2008 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2008 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 6-4 | Donald Young | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donald Young | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |