H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Wayne Odesnik H2H: 0-1
Wayne Odesnik holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wayne Odesnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Odesnik won the 2008 San Jose third round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Odesnik | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wayne Odesnik | #267 | #77 | 984 | 1,729 | 40 | 59 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donald Young | Wayne Odesnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #383 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #126 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #119 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #813 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |