H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Doug Crawford vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 0-1
Raul Ramirez holds a 1–0 lead over Doug Crawford in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raul Ramirez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raul Ramirez won the 1977 Columbus third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1977* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Raul Ramirez | 6-2 6-3 | Doug Crawford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doug Crawford | #798 | #117 | 0 | 1,510 | 16 | 48 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Doug Crawford | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1973 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1974 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #138 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1975 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #138 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1977 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #198 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |