H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dusan Vemic vs Sam Warburg H2H: 1-0

Dusan Vemic holds a 1–0 lead over Sam Warburg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dusan Vemic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Vemic won the 2008 Los Angeles Open round of 32 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Vemic
SRB Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sam Warburg
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Vemic #178 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Sam Warburg #139 Match data Aug 7, 2008* R32 Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Vemic #1,520 #146 324 1,620 10 15 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Warburg #814 #132 612 1,613 5 10 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Vemic Sam Warburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1998 1–2 33.3% #268 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #174 1,482 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2007 1–2 33.3% #176 1,514 0 0
25 2001 0–1 0.0% #458 1,487 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #143 1,595 0 0
27 2003 1–1 50.0% #237 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2005 3–2 60.0% #246 1,443 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2006 3–2 60.0% #386 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 1–2 33.3% #238 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Vemic Sam Warburg
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 5 6 16.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Vemic Sam Warburg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1998 3/3 5.0 4.3 64.0% 71.6% 46.4% 55.5% 36.9% 62.7% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 3.0 2.3 66.1% 62.1% 56.3% 31.0% 51.9% 60.1% 36.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 4.0 3.0 64.5% 72.1% 54.8% 63.3% 44.4% 65.8% 30.1%
25 2001 1/1 4.0 7.0 64.1% 70.0% 32.1% 50.0% 25.0% 56.4% 32.8% 2008 9/9 6.0 3.2 67.4% 69.9% 51.7% 60.8% 32.3% 63.8% 36.2%
27 2003 2/2 8.0 4.0 61.2% 73.7% 55.6% 53.6% 66.7% 66.2% 25.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 5/5 5.4 2.0 64.6% 65.1% 56.9% 64.2% 37.0% 61.9% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 5/5 8.8 4.4 60.4% 72.3% 52.4% 79.4% 42.0% 63.6% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 6/6 11.3 4.0 62.0% 76.5% 56.4% 56.5% 49.3% 67.7% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 3/3 6.3 5.3 67.1% 64.7% 47.4% 41.1% 15.0% 59.1% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Vemic Sam Warburg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1998 1504 111.3 +1.68 -1.17 0.799 47.1% — +38 — 37.5% -0.63 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1482 108.7 -0.78 +1.10 0.909 48.4% +29 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–1 — -0.20
24 2000 1499 100.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1515 108.2 -0.87 -1.20 0.880 48.3% — — — 37.5% -0.88 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2001 1488 100.1 -0.92 -1.00 0.752 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.06 2008 1596 110.7 +0.53 -0.13 1.001 49.9% -10 — — 30.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.42
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1553 96.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1483 100.7 -2.52 +1.98 0.745 46.2% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1438 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1443 100.7 0.00 -0.15 1.048 49.9% — — +114 50.0% -0.10 1–1 — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1482 102.8 -0.29 -0.66 0.995 50.2% — +57 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–0 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1579 114.8 -0.39 -3.70 0.997 49.8% — +28 — 38.9% -0.39 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1539 108.8 -1.22 +1.14 0.751 45.4% -10 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1549 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1449 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1620 107.5 -0.33 -0.94 0.920 48.6% -10 +44 +114 41.7% -0.58 4–8 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 +3.32 — 1613 109.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.958 49.2% 0 — — 31.6% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.