H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
E. Teltscher vs M. Cahill H2H: 4-1
E. Teltscher holds a 4–1 lead over M. Cahill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, E. Teltscher leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, E. Teltscher won the 1982 San Francisco fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1982* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | E. Teltscher | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | M. Cahill | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1980* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | E. Teltscher | 6-1 7-6 | M. Cahill | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1980* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | E. Teltscher | 7-6 7-6 | M. Cahill | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1979* | Stowe | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | M. Cahill | 6-3 7-5 | E. Teltscher | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1979* | Washington | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | E. Teltscher | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | M. Cahill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Teltscher | #1,093 | #6 | 15 | 2,091 | 392 | 207 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| M. Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | E. Teltscher | M. Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #106 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 71–27 | 72.4% | #10 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1981 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,909 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,928 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #24 | 1,830 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #53 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #138 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |