H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
E. Winogradsky vs M. Bahrami H2H: 0-1
M. Bahrami holds a 1–0 lead over E. Winogradsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Bahrami leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, M. Bahrami won the 1987 Nancy fourth round 7-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IRI
Age 70
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1987* | Nancy | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | M. Bahrami | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | E. Winogradsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. Winogradsky | #473 | #89 | 169 | 1,571 | 22 | 41 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Bahrami | #1,159 | #192 | 55 | 1,564 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | E. Winogradsky | M. Bahrami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #294 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #139 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #224 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #504 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #378 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #250 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #196 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #332 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |