H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Jan Hajek H2H: 1-1
Edouard Roger-Vasselin and Jan Hajek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2013 Barcelona second round 6-2 6-7(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 6-2 6-7(1) 6-2 | Jan Hajek | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2012* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jan Hajek | 4-1 (ret.) | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |