H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Nathan Healey H2H: 1-0

Edouard Roger-Vasselin holds a 1–0 lead over Nathan Healey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2004 Shanghai Masters round of 32 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4.

FRA Age 42 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Age 46 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #109 6-7(7) 6-2 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 Nathan Healey #174 Match data Jun 26, 2007* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #222 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Nathan Healey #328 Match data Sep 30, 2004* R32 Shanghai Masters International Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #806 #35 1,133 1,886 84 125 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathan Healey #1,134 #159 268 1,579 6 13 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Nathan Healey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2004 1–2 33.3% #197 1,450 0 0
23 2007 5–7 41.7% #97 1,578 0 0
24 2008 2–6 25.0% #166 1,574 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #344 1,467 0 0
25 2009 2–3 40.0% #153 1,645 0 0 2005 2–3 40.0% #241 1,488 0 0
26 2010 2–7 22.2% #124 1,611 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #162 1,506 0 0
27 2011 6–12 33.3% #106 1,687 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #259 1,514 0 0
28 2012 14–19 42.4% #102 1,665 0 0
29 2013 23–26 46.9% #52 1,817 0 0
30 2014 21–28 42.9% #87 1,693 0 0
31 2015 6–12 33.3% #123 1,758 0 0
32 2016 2–3 40.0% #293 1,678 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Nathan Healey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2009 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2010 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2013 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2014 14 18 32 43.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2015 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 48 72 120 40.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Nathan Healey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2004 3/3 3.0 2.0 73.4% 61.2% 44.5% 29.2% 61.1% 57.5% 30.3% —/—
23 2007 12/12 2.8 2.2 67.3% 64.9% 44.0% 48.6% 33.4% 58.0% 35.9% —/—
24 2008 8/8 2.8 2.6 63.7% 64.9% 44.1% 55.0% 53.5% 57.4% 31.6% 2004 2/2 12.5 8.0 46.0% 79.2% 52.6% 47.2% 68.8% 64.4% 29.4%
25 2009 5/5 7.4 1.4 64.2% 68.3% 47.0% 70.6% 46.7% 60.7% 33.3% 2005 5/5 10.8 4.6 58.0% 76.2% 46.1% 60.3% 60.8% 63.9% 36.9%
26 2010 9/9 4.7 3.4 59.4% 67.6% 47.1% 45.8% 30.0% 59.1% 35.0% 2006 6/6 7.2 5.8 59.4% 70.1% 52.2% 62.5% 31.8% 62.6% 31.5%
27 2011 18/18 4.0 2.4 63.0% 68.3% 52.3% 51.5% 35.3% 62.1% 37.5% 2007 6/6 5.7 6.2 53.7% 73.7% 50.1% 61.7% 27.1% 63.0% 34.5%
28 2012 33/33 5.0 2.7 64.3% 71.7% 50.2% 57.1% 38.8% 64.0% 35.8% —/—
29 2013 49/49 3.9 2.5 63.7% 70.9% 50.4% 58.9% 40.5% 63.4% 36.8% —/—
30 2014 49/49 4.3 2.3 66.4% 70.5% 51.2% 68.7% 37.5% 64.0% 34.5% —/—
31 2015 18/18 5.0 2.2 64.5% 70.1% 47.3% 44.3% 35.0% 61.9% 35.1% —/—
32 2016 5/5 4.0 2.2 68.3% 61.0% 47.0% 45.0% 46.8% 56.6% 36.1% —/—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Nathan Healey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2003 1503 98.4
20 2004 1450 90.3 -2.33 -2.96 0.712 43.6% 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–0 +0.48
21 2005 1469 106.4
23 2007 1578 108.2 -1.34 -0.29 0.854 47.0% -145 +16 +81 42.4% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.09
24 2008 1575 118.4 -1.74 -2.54 0.743 45.6% -109 -18 22.2% -1.39 0–2 0–1 -0.20 2004 1467 100.2 -0.87 -3.23 0.828 48.6% 33.3% -0.83 0–2 0–1 +0.44
25 2009 1646 121.4 +0.50 -0.06 0.849 48.5% -88 42.9% -0.36 1–1 0–1 -0.27 2005 1489 112.3 -0.58 -0.57 1.023 50.1% +13 22.2% -0.89 0–2 -0.16
26 2010 1612 119.9 -2.05 -0.35 0.854 47.2% -4 29.2% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) -0.25 2006 1507 102.1 +1.28 -2.02 0.843 47.5% -4 31.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) +0.45
27 2011 1688 137.6 -0.32 -0.04 0.991 49.7% -24 -33 +47 41.7% -0.40 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) +0.15 2007 1514 113.5 -0.22 -1.43 0.935 49.3% +8 41.7% -0.08 0–1 0–1 -0.14
28 2012 1666 139.7 +0.76 -1.06 0.993 50.0% +27 -35 +91 45.9% +0.07 5–9 (36%) 6–10 (38%) -0.14 2008 1513 105.1
29 2013 1817 146.6 -0.17 +0.53 1.005 50.0% -16 -55 -141 45.0% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 4–15 (21%) -0.06
30 2014 1694 149.9 -0.06 -0.92 0.959 49.5% +33 0 +37 47.2% -0.02 7–11 (39%) 13–18 (42%) -1.58
31 2015 1758 131.8 -1.35 -0.48 0.921 48.2% +25 38.8% -0.88 4–7 (36%) 6–1 (86%) -0.93
32 2016 1679 115.8 -0.56 -0.28 0.832 46.3% 46.7% -1.13 0–2 2–0 -0.31
Career 1887 138.3 -0.34 -0.48 0.943 49.0% 0 -26 +24 42.9% -0.34 31–49 (39%) 38–53 (42%) 89.6 -1.53 1579 112.0 +0.09 -1.58 0.917 48.9% +6 32.6% -0.84 0–3 (0%) 0–7 (0%) 90.2 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.