H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Richard Bloomfield H2H: 1-0
Edouard Roger-Vasselin holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Bloomfield in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2011 Newport third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2011* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 6-4 6-0 | Richard Bloomfield | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Bloomfield | #1,850 | #176 | 244 | 1,616 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Richard Bloomfield | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #469 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #358 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |