H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Takao Suzuki
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Takao Suzuki.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |