H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Eduardo Schwank vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-1
Eduardo Schwank and Robby Ginepri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2010 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Eduardo Schwank | 6-4 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-0 | Eduardo Schwank | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2008 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Eduardo Schwank | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Schwank | #1,858 | #48 | 1,380 | 1,742 | 37 | 61 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eduardo Schwank | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #118 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |