H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Edward Corrie vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Edward Corrie vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Edward Corrie
GBR Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Inigo Cervantes Huegun
ESP Age 36 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Inigo Cervantes Huegun 6-3 7-5 Edward Corrie #240 Match data Jun 30, 2015* Q2 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Edward Corrie #1,368 #215 225 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Inigo Cervantes Huegun — — — 1,667 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Edward Corrie Inigo Cervantes Huegun
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
25 2013 0–1 0.0% #300 1,434 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Edward Corrie Inigo Cervantes Huegun
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 48.0% 75.0% 30.8% 42.9% 33.3% 52.0% 26.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 5/5 5.8 2.8 55.4% 65.9% 48.7% 35.1% 47.5% 58.3% 34.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 3.4 4.4 54.2% 68.7% 43.9% 55.8% 53.1% 57.2% 40.7%
25 2013 1/1 2.0 5.0 58.6% 69.0% 41.5% 85.7% 25.0% 57.6% 29.6% 2015 1/1 6.0 0.0 53.0% 71.4% 45.2% 50.0% 25.0% 59.1% 38.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/36 7.1 4.4 50.2% 71.9% 46.8% 52.6% 44.4% 59.6% 34.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 6.0 6.0 44.6% 62.1% 44.4% 37.5% 25.0% 52.3% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Edward Corrie Inigo Cervantes Huegun
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1483 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1479 107.3 +0.62 +1.86 0.553 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1461 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1600 110.1 -0.67 -2.13 0.821 46.7% — -12 — 37.5% -0.69 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.15
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1562 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1450 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1558 105.8 -2.90 -0.85 0.951 48.9% — +80 — 38.5% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.62
25 2013 1434 99.0 -1.32 -0.95 0.697 45.9% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.01 2015 1557 105.2 -0.73 -1.97 0.942 47.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
26 2014 1419 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1606 133.4 -2.80 -1.65 0.848 47.4% -109 +70 — 37.5% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 102.8 -0.16
27 2015 1433 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1521 101.2 -0.67 -5.04 0.874 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
28 2016 1466 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1512 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1449 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1442 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1500 101.3 -1.32 -0.95 0.697 45.9% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -1.00 — 1668 118.4 -2.44 -1.62 0.852 47.3% -109 +63 — 35.8% -0.82 9–7 (56%) 7–15 (32%) 103.1 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.