H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Juan Ignacio Londero H2H: 0-1
Juan Ignacio Londero holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Londero leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Londero won the 2019 Rio de Janeiro third round 2-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Londero | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Juan Ignacio Londero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |