H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Elias Ymer vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 0-1

Lukas Rosol holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elias Ymer
Sweden Age 30 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #43 6-2 7-6(7) 6-3 Elias Ymer #175 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elias Ymer #204 #105 534 1,696 29 68 29.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elias Ymer Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 1–2 33.3% #228 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2015 3–8 27.3% #136 1,668 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2016 2–7 22.2% #160 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2017 1–5 16.7% #142 1,593 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2018 3–7 30.0% #115 1,628 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2019 1–5 16.7% #176 1,533 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2021 3–7 30.0% #170 1,603 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2022 8–7 53.3% #127 1,616 0 0 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2023 4–9 30.8% #155 1,626 0 0 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2024 0–4 0.0% #327 1,568 0 0 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2025 3–3 50.0% #173 1,602 0 0 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2026 0–3 0.0% #204 1,586 0 0 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elias Ymer Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2018 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2022 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2023 3 4 7 42.9% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2025 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2026 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 16 33 49 32.7% 13 31 44 29.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 97/97 of Elias Ymer's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elias Ymer Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 1/1 2.0 8.0 52.0% 66.0% 46.9% 55.6% 25.0% 56.9% 30.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 3/3 3.7 2.7 56.4% 71.8% 47.1% 43.3% 37.8% 61.1% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 11/11 3.6 3.3 59.6% 67.9% 44.9% 47.3% 36.0% 59.1% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 9/9 4.4 3.4 57.5% 63.5% 47.8% 46.2% 29.9% 56.7% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 6/6 5.0 3.2 59.0% 67.9% 43.6% 67.7% 52.8% 58.1% 31.8% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2018 10/10 3.7 2.8 59.1% 68.3% 45.9% 56.0% 27.3% 58.9% 35.9% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2019 6/6 4.0 4.0 63.7% 65.8% 45.5% 55.9% 34.1% 58.4% 37.2% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2021 10/10 3.7 4.5 53.6% 68.3% 49.7% 44.4% 38.6% 59.6% 39.1% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2022 15/15 6.2 3.7 58.8% 74.0% 53.1% 61.3% 48.7% 65.5% 38.1% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2023 13/13 4.2 3.1 57.9% 65.5% 45.3% 44.9% 53.4% 56.9% 35.2% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2024 4/4 8.5 5.0 59.2% 68.0% 48.6% 63.9% 26.3% 59.7% 29.0% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2025 6/6 4.2 2.3 63.5% 70.7% 47.7% 72.3% 40.7% 62.2% 39.3% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2026 3/3 4.0 1.3 78.7% 67.3% 37.0% 38.3% 6.0% 63.3% 25.7% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 97/97 4.5 3.4 59.2% 68.3% 47.2% 53.4% 38.9% 59.9% 35.0% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elias Ymer Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2012 1486 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 1488 108.2 -0.53 +2.72 0.703 44.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1506 103.4 -1.06 -1.59 0.885 47.2% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1669 124.6 -3.15 -1.32 0.803 46.3% -79 -35 — 28.1% -1.31 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.3 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1614 109.0 -3.61 -2.97 0.726 44.5% -69 +24 — 27.3% -1.82 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1594 119.3 -1.14 -3.29 0.759 46.2% -63 — — 26.7% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.22 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2018 1628 120.0 -3.31 -0.37 0.874 47.2% -22 +45 — 37.0% -1.07 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.70 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2019 1533 107.7 -2.38 -0.18 0.893 47.9% — +71 — 35.3% -1.24 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.67 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2020 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2021 1603 129.2 -1.44 +0.84 0.968 49.0% +44 — — 29.2% -0.71 2–0 0–5 (0%) — -0.73 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 97.7 +0.09
26 2022 1616 120.0 +0.62 -0.62 1.105 51.8% -3 +23 — 48.6% -0.03 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 +0.55 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) 102.8 -1.04
27 2023 1626 119.3 -3.82 -0.08 0.817 46.8% -37 +71 — 36.7% -0.83 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.48 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 97.4 +1.39
28 2024 1568 113.6 -1.63 -1.86 0.721 46.0% — — — 25.0% -1.08 0–2 0–1 — -0.28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) 107.1 -1.09
29 2025 1602 112.3 -0.97 -0.18 1.040 50.3% -45 +45 — 50.0% -0.14 1–1 2–0 — +0.10 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) 102.7 -1.23
30 2026 1587 108.0 -0.82 -0.86 0.700 44.7% — — — 12.5% -2.00 — — — -0.03 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -1.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1697 122.3 -2.01 -0.83 0.874 47.7% -23 +32 — 34.3% -0.96 16–21 (43%) 13–19 (41%) 98.3 +1.05 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.