H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 02:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-0
Elias Ymer holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Kyrgios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elias Ymer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elias Ymer won the 2015 Barcelona third round 2-6 7-5 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Elias Ymer | 2-6 7-5 7-6(7) | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 |