H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 1-1
Elias Ymer and Thiago Monteiro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Elias Ymer won the 2019 Bastad third round 6-3 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2019* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Elias Ymer | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2018* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Monteiro | 6-4 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |