H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Thiago Seyboth Wild H2H: 0-1
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2019 Sao Paulo third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2019* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thiago Seyboth Wild | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |