H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Eliot Teltscher vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-0

Eliot Teltscher holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Vant Hof in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eliot Teltscher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1984 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-7 2-6 6-3.

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eliot Teltscher #17 6-7 2-6 6-3 Robert Vant Hof Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eliot Teltscher #1,093 #6 15 2,093 392 207 65.4% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Robert Vant Hof 1,879 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Eliot Teltscher Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1976 1–1 50.0% #239 1,503 0 0
1977 9–14 39.1% #95 1,535 0 0
1978 24–18 57.1% #42 1,753 0 1
1979 42–25 62.7% #25 1,851 0 2
1980 71–27 72.4% #10 1,977 0 4
1981 54–19 74.0% #8 2,055 0 6
1982 38–18 67.9% #14 1,908 0 6
1983 43–19 69.4% #13 1,929 0 7
1984 42–19 68.9% #8 1,989 0 9
1985 19–12 61.3% #24 1,832 0 9
1986 13–11 54.2% #53 1,798 0 9
1987 24–13 64.9% #20 1,841 0 10
1988 11–9 55.0% #138 1,718 0 10
1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,695 0 10

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Eliot Teltscher Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1976 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1977 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 15 7 22 68.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1979 19 9 28 67.9% 16 9 25 64.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1980 17 4 21 81.0% 27 10 37 73.0% 27 13 40 67.5% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1981 24 5 29 82.8% 20 8 28 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1982 11 6 17 64.7% 18 8 26 69.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1983 18 6 24 75.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 19 6 25 76.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 19 8 27 70.4% 1987 0 2 2 0.0%
1985 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
1986 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
1987 14 7 21 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 161 69 230 70.0% 118 66 184 64.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 107 66 173 61.8% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Eliot Teltscher Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1976 1504 104.2 50.0% +0.75 0–1 +0.46 1978 1492 112.1 +23 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.05
1977 1536 117.0 +77 -37 -20 38.5% -0.71 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.84 1979 1507 114.7 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) -0.60
1978 1753 143.7 +29 -172 56.6% +0.76 9–7 (56%) 2–8 (20%) 100.4 +2.68 1980 1593 123.7 -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 104.7 +1.15
1979 1851 154.6 +26 -72 57.4% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) 105.2 -3.43 1981 1667 131.2 +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -0.32
1980 1978 160.5 +24 -59 67.7% +1.30 15–11 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 102.1 -1.55 1982 1691 125.8 +19 -146 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 105.0 +3.05
1981 2056 165.2 +86 -119 69.6% +1.37 13–7 (65%) 7–6 (54%) 102.5 -3.60 1983 1722 139.5 -34 -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) 107.1 -1.98
1982 1908 154.7 +84 +10 65.4% +1.01 6–9 (40%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -0.77 1984 1580 107.4 -11 +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 +0.46
1983 1929 154.5 +69 -39 -274 61.6% +0.98 14–2 (88%) 11–15 (42%) 105.3 -0.44 1985 1520 97.1 +10 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.84
1984 1990 156.3 +52 -164 64.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 96.6 -0.79 1987 1498 104.8 28.6% -1.86 0–1 -0.12
1985 1833 139.0 +91 -69 58.3% +0.33 7–6 (54%) 9–5 (64%) 100.2 +1.47 1988 1524 125.6 +5 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.53
1986 1799 140.4 +83 -20 50.8% +0.33 5–1 (83%) 3–5 (38%) 102.3 -0.98 1989 1555 113.9 +30 -5 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.0 +0.26
1987 1841 145.9 +79 -83 60.2% +0.86 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 98.1 -0.10 1990 1536 95.9 0.0% -3.00 +0.20
1988 1718 115.7 +65 58.5% +0.54 1–2 (33%) 2–0 +2.12
1990 1696 107.4 +55 37.5% -0.62 1–1 0–1 -0.08
Career 2094 157.9 +58 -67 -133 61.6% +0.88 102–71 (59%) 75–79 (49%) 99.5 -0.70 Career 1880 131.6 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.