H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilio Benfele Alvarez vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Emilio Benfele Alvarez holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilio Benfele Alvarez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Benfele Alvarez won the 2001 Umag third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Benfele Alvarez | 6-1 6-2 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Benfele Alvarez | #1,529 | #81 | 591 | 1,670 | 45 | 67 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Benfele Alvarez | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #103 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #190 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #125 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |