Emilio Montano
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Pattison | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 30, 1979 | — |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 31, 1980 | H2H |
| Gene Mayer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 23, 1980 | H2H |
| Bill Scanlon | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 31, 1980 | H2H |
| John Marks | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 18, 1979 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Ken Rosewall holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Montano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1976 Mexico City Wct round of 16 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Rosewall | 6-1 6-3 | Emilio Montano | Match data | Mar 13, 1976* | R16 | Mexico City Wct | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Montano | #752 | #99 | 0 | 1,552 | 19 | 49 | 27.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,233 | 535 | 193 | 73.5% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 34 | 39 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Montano | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #158 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,854 | 1 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,943 | 1 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,086 | 2 | 13 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,158 | 3 | 21 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,117 | 4 | 28 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,106 | 4 | 33 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 26–7 | 78.8% | #9 | 2,114 | 4 | 33 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #6 | 1,998 | 4 | 36 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,978 | 4 | 38 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #11 | 1,981 | 4 | 39 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,809 | 4 | 39 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,747 | 4 | 39 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,747 | 4 | 39 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emilio Montano | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1484 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 1476 | 94.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 1454 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 1505 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +90 | -29 | — | 33.3% | -1.25 | 2–0 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 1488 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | 32.5% | -1.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 1479 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | 30.0% | -1.40 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 1544 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -12 | — | 39.0% | -0.83 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 1475 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +14 | — | 13.6% | -2.36 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 1454 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1855 | 127.3 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -15 | -122 | 72.6% | +1.53 | 6–4 (60%) | — | — | +0.08 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1944 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +58 | -13 | -84 | 64.8% | +1.25 | 11–10 (52%) | — | — | -2.55 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2087 | 161.2 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -47 | +195 | 72.2% | +1.57 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.1 | -3.59 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2159 | 161.8 | — | — | — | — | +91 | -83 | +112 | 73.0% | +1.68 | 13–5 (72%) | 11–9 (55%) | 103.2 | -5.10 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2118 | 162.7 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +74 | +120 | 74.4% | +1.64 | 14–8 (64%) | 14–8 (64%) | 101.2 | -2.93 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2106 | 159.5 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +119 | +57 | 74.3% | +1.84 | 13–12 (52%) | 11–9 (55%) | 92.8 | -2.08 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2114 | 153.5 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +148 | 68.8% | +1.19 | 5–2 (71%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.3 | -1.13 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1998 | 149.9 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +205 | +172 | 72.2% | +1.56 | 9–3 (75%) | 2–7 (22%) | 96.0 | +0.64 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1978 | 156.6 | — | — | — | — | +69 | +134 | +115 | 63.2% | +0.93 | 6–5 (55%) | 9–0 (100%) | 103.4 | -0.11 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1982 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | +99 | +50 | +68 | 62.2% | +0.78 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–6 (65%) | 99.0 | -1.33 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1809 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | +145 | +61 | +178 | 51.1% | +0.18 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–4 (50%) | 94.8 | -0.68 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1748 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | +136 | — | +221 | 52.4% | -0.05 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | +0.41 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1748 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +115 | — | — | 53.3% | -0.33 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -0.23 |
| Career | — | 1553 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -9 | — | 30.7% | -1.40 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | +2.85 | — | 2234 | 159.3 | — | — | — | — | +43 | +53 | +84 | 69.0% | +1.35 | 103–75 (58%) | 74–52 (59%) | 97.4 | -2.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Pattison | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 30, 1979 | — |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 31, 1980 | H2H |
| Gene Mayer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 23, 1980 | H2H |
| Bill Scanlon | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 31, 1980 | H2H |
| John Marks | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 18, 1979 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Laver | 7 | 24 | 31 | Apr 10, 1976 | H2H |
| Marty Riessen | 17 | 6 | 23 | Jan 10, 1977 | H2H |
| John Newcombe | 12 | 10 | 22 | Oct 19, 1974 | H2H |
| Andres Gimeno | 17 | 4 | 21 | Nov 5, 1971 | H2H |
| Arthur Ashe | 13 | 7 | 20 | Feb 3, 1978 | H2H |