H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Eric Jelen vs Bruno Oresar H2H: 1-1

Eric Jelen and Bruno Oresar are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bruno Oresar leads 1–0 on clay, while Eric Jelen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruno Oresar won the 1990 Roland Garros round of 128 7-6 4-6 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eric Jelen
GER Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Bruno Oresar
CRO Age 59 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bruno Oresar #108 7-6 4-6 2-6 6-1 6-4 Eric Jelen #88 Match data May 30, 1990* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Eric Jelen #68 6-3 6-2 6-4 Bruno Oresar #84 Match data Sep 3, 1987* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eric Jelen #1,153 #23 575 1,804 124 128 49.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bruno Oresar #673 #46 296 1,713 52 68 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eric Jelen Bruno Oresar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 2–3 40.0% #450 1,507 0 0 1985 6–5 54.5% #82 1,565 0 0
19 1984 5–9 35.7% #168 1,502 0 0 1986 6–10 37.5% #159 1,587 0 0
20 1985 2–3 40.0% #172 1,508 0 0 1987 5–9 35.7% #111 1,550 0 0
21 1986 17–15 53.1% #31 1,690 0 0 1988 16–12 57.1% #57 1,653 0 0
22 1987 22–19 53.7% #40 1,749 0 0 1989 9–14 39.1% #88 1,575 0 0
23 1988 18–18 50.0% #76 1,699 0 0 1990 7–16 30.4% #159 1,547 0 0
24 1989 22–14 61.1% #47 1,727 0 1 1991 3–2 60.0% #239 1,576 0 0
25 1990 23–23 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1991 13–24 35.1% #118 1,614 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eric Jelen Bruno Oresar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1985 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1991 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 34 61 44.3% 24 39 63 38.1% 33 19 52 63.5% 40 36 76 52.6% — 13 17 30 43.3% 37 44 81 45.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eric Jelen Bruno Oresar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1983 1507 108.1 — — — — +60 — — 46.2% -0.23 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.78 1985 1566 126.2 — — — — — +35 — 53.8% +0.08 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
19 1984 1502 118.0 — — — — +76 +32 — 38.2% -0.82 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.91 1986 1588 122.3 — — — — — +32 — 40.5% -0.78 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.71
20 1985 1508 108.2 — — — — +92 — — 41.7% -0.17 1–1 — — +0.49 1987 1551 117.9 — — — — -37 +23 — 40.0% -0.17 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.10
21 1986 1690 137.8 — — — — +8 -107 -67 52.3% -0.19 6–4 (60%) 6–5 (55%) — 0.00 1988 1654 130.2 — — — — -95 +32 — 52.2% +0.09 6–3 (67%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.73
22 1987 1749 130.4 — — — — -8 -196 -56 52.3% -0.08 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.20 1989 1576 113.9 — — — — -40 +33 — 40.4% -0.49 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.22
23 1988 1700 126.6 — — — — +2 -190 +41 47.9% -0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.96 1990 1547 120.7 — — — — +45 -1 — 37.1% -0.82 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.01
24 1989 1727 134.8 — — — — -18 -219 +80 57.9% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 3–10 (23%) — +1.00 1991 1576 110.4 +0.38 +0.80 1.126 52.3% — +7 — 54.5% +0.82 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
25 1990 1708 129.1 — — — — -46 -113 +104 45.5% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1614 136.6 -3.04 -1.39 0.853 47.3% 0 +59 +115 38.9% -0.82 6–7 (46%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1805 136.4 -3.04 -1.39 0.853 47.3% -6 -69 +38 48.4% -0.24 52–38 (58%) 34–46 (43%) 101.1 -0.32 — 1714 128.3 +0.38 +0.80 1.126 52.3% -24 +26 — 44.1% -0.32 17–17 (50%) 19–21 (48%) 100.8 +0.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.