H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Eric Jelen vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 0-2
Eliot Teltscher holds a 2–0 lead over Eric Jelen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eliot Teltscher leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1987 Monte Carlo second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1987* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Eliot Teltscher | 6-2 6-2 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
| May 10, 1986* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Eliot Teltscher | 6-1 6-4 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Jelen | #1,153 | #23 | 575 | 1,805 | 124 | 127 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eliot Teltscher | #1,093 | #6 | 15 | 2,091 | 392 | 207 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eric Jelen | Eliot Teltscher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #106 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #31 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 71–27 | 72.4% | #10 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #76 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,909 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #47 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,928 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1990 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1991 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #118 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #24 | 1,830 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #53 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #138 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |