H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Eric Korita vs Rick Fagel H2H: 1-0

Eric Korita holds a 1–0 lead over Rick Fagel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eric Korita leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eric Korita won the 1983 South Orange round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eric Korita
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rick Fagel
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eric Korita 6-3 3-6 6-3 Rick Fagel Match data Jul 28, 1983* R32 South Orange ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eric Korita #862 #46 0 1,726 29 32 47.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rick Fagel #759 #60 0 1,615 47 99 32.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eric Korita Rick Fagel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
19 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1983 16–12 57.1% #49 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1984 9–13 40.9% #126 1,650 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,481 0 0
22 1985 1–3 25.0% #480 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1986 1–2 33.3% #484 1,622 0 0 1977 9–15 37.5% #75 1,526 0 0
24 1987 0–1 0.0% #431 1,610 0 0 1978 11–18 37.9% #135 1,565 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1979 7–19 26.9% #113 1,512 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1980 9–16 36.0% #135 1,552 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1981 11–19 36.7% #99 1,583 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1982 0–9 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% #217 1,445 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eric Korita Rick Fagel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
24 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 14 13 27 51.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 8 14 42.9% — 9 19 28 32.1% 37 69 106 34.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eric Korita Rick Fagel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1490 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.13
19 1982 1545 113.1 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1662 132.6 — — — — +19 -27 -152 57.1% +0.33 4–4 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1984 1650 126.9 — — — — +62 — — 44.4% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 -0.07 1975 1481 103.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08
22 1985 1618 103.6 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.30 1–1 1–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1623 115.8 — — — — +39 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.45 1977 1527 120.3 — — — — -35 +49 — 42.3% -0.58 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.2 +0.64
24 1987 1610 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00 1978 1566 131.2 — — — — -73 +52 — 39.4% -0.76 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 101.3 +1.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1512 123.8 — — — — -14 +13 — 31.8% -1.24 4–6 (40%) 1–7 (13%) 95.8 -1.38
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1553 134.1 — — — — -48 +9 — 40.4% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 +0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1583 136.8 — — — — -16 -8 — 37.8% -0.85 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 104.0 -1.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1456 94.2 — — — — +50 +72 — 13.0% -3.13 0–2 — — +0.72
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1446 100.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10
Career — 1726 131.1 — — — — +44 -27 -152 49.7% -0.13 8–11 (42%) 16–9 (64%) 105.9 +2.62 — 1616 132.2 — — — — -27 +25 — 36.1% -0.97 16–28 (36%) 11–19 (37%) 96.9 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.