H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Eric Taino vs John Van Lottum

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Eric Taino vs John Van Lottum.

PHI Age 51 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-3 6-1 Eric Taino #202 Match data May 27, 2002 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eric Taino #1,105 #122 320 1,566 11 18 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum 1,719 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eric Taino John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
24 1999 1–2 33.3% #401 1,516 0 0
25 2000 4–4 50.0% #205 1,550 0 0
26 2001 0–2 0.0% #241 1,537 0 0
27 2002 0–1 0.0% #179 1,529 0 0
28 2003 5–6 45.5% #133 1,523 0 0
29 2004 0–2 0.0% #286 1,438 0 0
30 2005 1–1 50.0% #240 1,440 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eric Taino John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 11 16 27 40.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 27/29 of Eric Taino's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eric Taino John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 1999 3/3 3.7 2.0 58.2% 66.6% 59.5% 53.6% 14.3% 63.4% 28.9% —/—
25 2000 6/8 2.5 1.0 57.6% 67.2% 49.7% 46.5% 33.0% 60.2% 35.0% —/—
26 2001 2/2 6.5 4.5 44.6% 70.2% 45.8% 47.2% 25.0% 56.0% 30.5% —/—
27 2002 1/1 6.0 3.0 50.8% 47.6% 55.7% 55.6% 20.0% 51.6% 31.3% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 2003 11/11 7.1 3.5 51.0% 77.0% 53.2% 61.8% 38.0% 65.1% 31.5% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 2004 2/2 1.5 4.5 52.9% 64.7% 39.3% 50.0% 6.3% 51.4% 32.7% —/—
30 2005 2/2 6.5 2.5 68.8% 74.6% 53.8% 25.0% 14.3% 67.9% 32.7% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eric Taino John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1996 1491 106.9 0.0% -3.75 -0.35
21 1997 1631 121.6 -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1998 1612 120.7 -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1999 1662 128.3 +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1999 1517 118.7 +1.56 +0.61 0.788 46.2% +35 33.3% -1.00 1–0 -0.31 2000 1517 104.0 +57 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 +0.38
25 2000 1550 107.0 -1.10 -1.62 0.880 47.4% +24 47.1% -0.53 1–0 1–0 +0.11 2001 1584 111.2 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 -0.48
26 2001 1537 100.3 -0.75 -2.13 0.693 43.3% 16.7% -2.50 -0.22 2002 1624 118.0 -2 -68 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 +0.19
27 2002 1529 96.8 -1.80 -1.16 0.646 41.9% 25.0% -2.75 1–0 +0.14 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 2003 1523 110.4 +0.55 -3.17 0.901 48.4% +59 44.4% -0.33 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +0.07 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 2004 1439 90.9 -0.63 -0.14 0.672 42.2% 20.0% -2.60 0–1 +0.23
30 2005 1441 97.4 +0.38 -0.01 1.020 48.5% 50.0% -0.50 1–0 +0.06 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
31 2006 1415 99.7
32 2007 1415 103.9
Career 1566 105.9 +0.01 -1.80 0.840 46.9% +44 39.1% -0.94 4–3 (57%) 8–5 (62%) 107.3 +0.28 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.