H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Erick Iskersky vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 1-0
Erick Iskersky holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Erick Iskersky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Erick Iskersky won the 1978 Cincinnati second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1978* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Erick Iskersky | 6-2 6-0 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erick Iskersky | #750 | #64 | 0 | 1,658 | 33 | 61 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Erick Iskersky | Ricardo Cano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #92 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #302 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #724 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |