H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Ernests Gulbis vs Alejandro Falla H2H: 2-1

Ernests Gulbis holds a 2–1 lead over Alejandro Falla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2014 Rome Masters second round 6-1 RET.

LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
COL Age 42 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Ernests Gulbis #17 6-1 (ret.) Alejandro Falla #73 Match data
Mar 1, 2012* Delray Beach ATP 250 R32 Hard Ernests Gulbis #78 6-4 6-1 Alejandro Falla #67 Match data
Aug 14, 2011 Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Ernests Gulbis #55 3-6 6-1 6-2 Alejandro Falla #109 Match data
Jul 30, 2010* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Alejandro Falla #65 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) Ernests Gulbis #28 Match data
Aug 10, 2009 Canada Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Alejandro Falla #163 7-6(4) 7-5 Ernests Gulbis #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Alejandro Falla #646 #50 869 1,813 97 158 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ernests Gulbis Alejandro Falla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #127 1,596 0 0
21 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1 2005 0–2 0.0% #231 1,532 0 0
22 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2 2006 4–8 33.3% #108 1,618 0 0
23 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2 2007 12–16 42.9% #81 1,738 0 0
24 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4 2008 6–11 35.3% #180 1,603 0 0
25 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6 2009 2–8 20.0% #81 1,744 0 0
26 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6 2010 14–19 42.4% #105 1,684 0 0
27 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6 2011 9–14 39.1% #74 1,714 0 0
28 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6 2012 14–23 37.8% #54 1,756 0 0
29 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6 2013 13–20 39.4% #99 1,707 0 0
30 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6 2014 9–17 34.6% #88 1,625 0 0
31 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6 2015 7–11 38.9% #122 1,713 0 0
32 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6 2016 1–1 50.0% #273 1,557 0 0
33 2017 1–1 50.0% #397 1,578 0 0