H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Ernests Gulbis vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 0-1

Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2016 Canadian Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #118 6-4 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #66 Match data Jul 27, 2016* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Rajeev Ram #126 3-6 6-3 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #101 Match data Aug 16, 2009 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ernests Gulbis Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ernests Gulbis Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ernests Gulbis Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% — 59.2% 13.4% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ernests Gulbis Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 — — 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.44 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.98 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) — -2.63 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.12 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 — 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.88 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 — 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) — -0.23 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.91 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) — -3.49 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) — -0.35 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) — +2.08 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 — 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.62 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 — +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.38 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.02 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 — — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.23 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.24 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 2022 1483 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.