H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ernests Gulbis vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 0-1
Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2016 Canada Masters second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 6-4 6-2 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2009 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rajeev Ram | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ernests Gulbis | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |