H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Ernests Gulbis vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 2-2

Ernests Gulbis and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2015 Halle Open first round 6-4 7-6(3).

LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sergiy Stakhovsky #123 7-6(5) 6-2 Ernests Gulbis #90 Match data Jun 17, 2019 Q1 Q Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Ernests Gulbis #84 6-3 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #136 Match data Feb 11, 2019 Q1 Q ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #111 6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 Ernests Gulbis #172 Match data Mar 22, 2017* Q1 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #166 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #107 Match data Feb 13, 2017 Q1 Q ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #86 6-4 7-6(3) Sergiy Stakhovsky #50 Match data Jun 18, 2015* R32 Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Sergiy Stakhovsky #90 6-4 6-3 7-6(5) Ernests Gulbis #10 Match data Jun 26, 2014* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ernests Gulbis #132 6-3 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #100 Match data Feb 11, 2013 Q1 Q ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #43 6-3 5-7 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #24 Match data Feb 24, 2011* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #24 6-4 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #50 Match data Jan 15, 2011* QF Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

5 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ernests Gulbis Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ernests Gulbis Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 3 1 4 75.0%
18 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 2007 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
29 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2020 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0%
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ernests Gulbis Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2% —/—
18 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9% 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8% 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7% 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% 59.2% 13.4% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 —/— 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 —/— 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 —/— 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
Career 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6% 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ernests Gulbis Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.44
18 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) -0.98 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% 0.0% -4.50 -0.01
19 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) -2.63 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) +0.25
20 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) -2.12 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 -0.41
21 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) -0.88 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% 0.0% -2.75 +0.11
22 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) -0.23 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 -0.41
23 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) -0.91 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) +1.40
24 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) -3.49 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) -0.67
25 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) -0.35 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) +0.79
26 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) +2.08 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) -1.40
27 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) -0.62 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) -0.19
28 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -0.03 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) -0.26
29 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) +0.38 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) -0.06
30 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) +0.02 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) -0.26
31 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) -0.23 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) -0.83
32 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% 0.0% -2.75 +0.24 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.05
33 2022 1483 103.6 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) +0.66
34 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% 0.0% -3.00 -0.10
35 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 +0.06
36 2022 1516 98.8
Career 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.