H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ethan Quinn vs Jordan Thompson H2H: 1-0
Ethan Quinn holds a 1–0 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ethan Quinn leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ethan Quinn won the 2025 Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 22
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025* | Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ethan Quinn | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Quinn | #47 | #47 | 1,021 | 1,771 | 26 | 39 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ethan Quinn | Jordan Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #344 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |