H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Evgeny Korolev vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-1
Evgeny Korolev and Michael Berrer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Berrer leads 1–0 on clay, while Evgeny Korolev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeny Korolev won the 2010 New Haven third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Evgeny Korolev | 6-4 7-5 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Michael Berrer | 6-1 6-4 | Evgeny Korolev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeny Korolev | #1,762 | #46 | 1,012 | 1,791 | 72 | 91 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeny Korolev | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #106 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #140 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #329 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |