H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 0-1
Danai Udomchoke holds a 1–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danai Udomchoke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danai Udomchoke won the 2011 Bangkok third round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2011* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danai Udomchoke | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabio Fognini | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |