H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Donald Young H2H: 1-2

Donald Young holds a 2–1 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Donald Young leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2017 Miami Open fourth round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabio Fognini #40 6-0 6-4 Donald Young #51 Match data Mar 29, 2017* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Donald Young #82 4-6 6-3 6-3 Fabio Fognini #34 Match data May 19, 2016* R32 Nice ATP 250 Clay
Donald Young #187 7-6(8) 6-3 Fabio Fognini #44 Match data Oct 18, 2012* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Donald Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0
25 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0
29 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabio Fognini Donald Young
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's and 310/313 of Donald Young's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabio Fognini Donald Young
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1%
18 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6% 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4%
19 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3% 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9%
20 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3% 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1%
21 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2% 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8%
22 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7% 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0%
23 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5% 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2%
24 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8% 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0%
25 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1% 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9%
26 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2% 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1%
27 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1% 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4%
28 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2% 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3%
29 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6% 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2%
30 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5% 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4%
32 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6% — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabio Fognini Donald Young
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03
18 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 +0.92
19 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.8 -0.26 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
20 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.0 +0.25 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
21 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) 98.2 +0.15 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 104.7 +2.05
22 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -0.90 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 92.3 +0.45
23 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 104.7 -0.82 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08
24 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 100.6 +0.45 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 +0.24
25 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) 109.7 +0.35 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -0.51
26 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) 105.6 -0.89 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 98.9 +0.47
27 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) 107.7 +2.30 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) 109.1 -0.96
28 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 106.5 +0.93 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 -1.41
29 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) 97.1 +0.07 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14
30 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 109.2 -0.17 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) 102.3 +2.85 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13
32 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) 104.4 +0.99 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.0 +0.27 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) 99.3 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.8 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) 101.7 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90 — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.