H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 2-4

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 4–2 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2019 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabio Fognini #12 6-3 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #92 Match data
Mar 12, 2017* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fabio Fognini #43 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #8 Match data
Jan 16, 2016* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #10 7-5 7-6(4) Fabio Fognini #21 Match data
Apr 18, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #12 5-7 6-3 6-0 Fabio Fognini #13 Match data
Jun 2, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #5 7-5 6-4 6-4 Fabio Fognini #45 Match data
Aug 10, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #16 6-4 7-6(0) Fabio Fognini #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga #296 #5 5,230 2,208 445 228 66.1% 0 2 0 3 13 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #163 1,549 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #338 1,547 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2007 14–10 58.3% #43 1,768 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0 2008 33–15 68.8% #6 1,994 0 2
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0 2009 48–20 70.6% #10 1,976 0 5
25 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0 2010 30–15 66.7% #13 1,974 0 5
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2 2011 56–23 70.9% #6 2,161 0 7
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2012 51–23 68.9% #8 2,054 0 9
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2013 36–16 69.2% #10 2,051 0 10
29 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4 2014 34–17 66.7% #12 2,070 0 11
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5 2015 32–15 68.1% #10 2,089 0 12
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8 2016 34–15 69.4% #12 2,141 0 12
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9 2017 35–15 70.0% #15 2,007 0 16
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9 2018 5–6 45.5% #239 1,922 0 16
34 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9 2019 32–18 64.0% #29 1,970 0 18
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9 2020 0–2 0.0% #62 1,910 0 18
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9 2021 1–8 11.1% #263 1,740 0 18
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9 2022 2–7 22.2% #296 1,686 0 18
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9 — — — — — — —