H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-1
Fabio Fognini and Lukas Rosol are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2014 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 6-3 6-2 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| May 30, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 6-2 7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabio Fognini | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |