H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 3-4

Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–3 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Fabio Fognini leads 3–2 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2014 Vina Del Mar semifinal 6-4 1-6 7-6(5).

ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 8, 2014* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 SF Clay Fabio Fognini #15 6-4 1-6 7-6(5) Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data
Oct 26, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Almagro #13 7-6(6) 6-2 Fabio Fognini #17 Match data
Jul 20, 2013* Hamburg ATP 500 SF Clay Fabio Fognini #25 6-4 7-6(1) Nicolas Almagro #15 Match data
Sep 25, 2009* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Fabio Fognini #87 6-4 7-6(3) Nicolas Almagro #30 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #18 6-2 7-5 6-0 Fabio Fognini #88 Match data
Feb 16, 2008* Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #31 6-1 6-1 Fabio Fognini #93 Match data
Apr 25, 2007* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Nicolas Almagro #32 6-3 6-2 Fabio Fognini #205 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9