H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 3-1
Fabio Fognini holds a 3–1 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2016 Moscow fourth round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Fabio Fognini | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 2-6 6-0 6-1 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fabio Fognini | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| May 3, 2013* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fabio Fognini | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabio Fognini | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |