H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 0-1

Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2013 US Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #128 6-1 6-2 6-2 Fabio Fognini #18 Match data Aug 28, 2013* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2
34 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabio Fognini Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — —
32 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabio Fognini Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
34 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabio Fognini Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.26 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.25 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.15 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.90 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.82 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.45 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.35 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.89 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) — +2.30 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.93 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.07 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.17 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — +2.85 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.99 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.27 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.27 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) — -0.21 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.