H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Fabio Fognini holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabio Fognini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2012 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Fabio Fognini | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fabio Fognini | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |