H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Fabrice Santoro vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 1-2
Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Fabrice Santoro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1994 Tel Aviv semifinal 7-6(2) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1994* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1993* | Tel Aviv | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-2 6-2 | Fabrice Santoro | Match data |
| May 14, 1992* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Fabrice Santoro | 6-1 6-0 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabrice Santoro | #142 | #17 | 1,516 | 1,889 | 456 | 432 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabrice Santoro | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #46 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #102 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1997 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #29 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2000 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #31 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2002 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,782 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2007 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,785 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #52 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,694 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,688 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |